
Localisation
| Leak localisation | m | Sealing |
| m | ||
![]() |
![]() |
Technical data
|
|
|
| Test pressure |
6 bar (absolute)
|
|
| Pressure outside | 1 bar (Atmosphere) | |
| ∆p | 6 bar | |
|
Air | |
|
10-3 mbar·l/s | |
7 bubbles with a diameter of 2 mm within 30 s
|
||
| Capacity |
120 St./h
|
|
| Effective cycle time | 30 s | |
| Changeover time | < 30 min | |
Background
Visual bubble test in the water bath done by an operator is the most common method for leak testing of Fuel-Distributor-Rails.
The disadvantage of this method in general is that the operator‘s result strongly depends on the boundary conditions as: lightning, contrast, water quality and not least on the
concentration of the operator.
Of course operator testing is not an automatic procedure and is increasingly no more accepted in automotive industry.
Other automatic leak testing methods are not so convenient for the Fuel-Distributor-Rail and can not localise the leak. Therefore an additional work step is required for analysing the leak.
Download Video Player
![]()
Leak rate
> Definition
> Calculation
> Conversion
![]()
Machine Building Applications in Ultrasound Computer Aided Measuring Systems Electric and Acoustic Sensor Technology

